Photo of Adrián Salgado

Adrián Salgado

Mexico’s Federal Administrative Court of Justice published in the April issue of its magazine a case decision in which it held that unilateral settlements and releases granted by governmental entities or departments in agreements subject to the Law of Public Works and Services Related to the Same (LOPSRM for its acronym in Spanish) may be appealed through administrative proceedings.

On November 9, 2022, the Department of Public Administration (“Department”) published the Agreement  issuing the Guidelines for the Registry of Business Integrity and Distinction of the Department of Public Administration (“Decree”).

In accordance with the published guidelines (Guidelines), the registry consists of a record maintained by the Department of companies that have an integrity policy

Recently, the Fifth Collegiate Labor Court of the First Circuit published judicial precedent number I.5o.T. J/1 L (11a.), titled “Resignation. Standards for weighing evidence that courts must consider if an employee argues that a resignation was forced, and he received instructions to execute it, and the employer states the termination was voluntary.”

In this decision

On October 29, 2021, the Second Chamber of Mexico’s Supreme Court of Justice published the judicial opinion through contradiction of prior decision number 2a./J. 1/2021 (11a.), captioned: “Audit Inspections. An inspection order issued to verify environmental compliance in accordance with the General Law for Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection need not indicate a time period

On March 12, 2021, the Second Chamber of Mexico’s National Supreme Court of Justice published a ruling in contradiction to opinion number 2a./J. 66/2020 (10a.), titled “Seniority Bonus. Even if not expressly requested, its payment is required when the employee’s seniority is confirmed and such employee has been terminated or the employment relationship has otherwise

On November 13, 2020, the Plenary Court on Labor Matters of the First Circuit issued a ruling in contradiction of ruling number PC.I.L. J/67 L (10a.) entitled: “Foreign employees. Such are entitled to the return of the accumulated funds in their individual Retirement Fund Administrator (AFORE) accounts, as well as contributions to the housing subaccount